AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
G2 research subsonic 2233/25/2023 Viewing the secondary tracks head-on, we can see that they take up about 6 inches at the widest point. Each bullet produced one large wound track and eight smaller, more shallow tracks reaching about 6 inches in depth. “Of the four shots fired, three produced full penetration of the 10 inch deep block, and one bullet base was stopped at the edge of the block by the 2×4 used to keep it from falling over. Is it enough to overcome the bad taste their previous marketing put in my mouth? No, but it's enough to persuade me to take a second look. The results were interesting, and it might be worth your time to check them out. He did so largely because of his experience with the DDupleks Hexalit slug. 223 and some of their 300 BLK subsonics to see how they'd do. That said – he broke out the chronograph, Clear Ballistics gel blocks, some. There have been a number of studies that yielded disappointing results about the G2RIP's performance (something Volk specifically mentions) it's hard not to be cynical, especially when it comes to something your life could depend on. I'm not a ballistician, and the more something is hyped the more I struggle to have any interest in it. That discovery enjoined me to take a closer look. Then I saw the author was Oleg Volk, who is one of the writers I try to follow. Close-mindedness is not a sterling quality in an editor, however, so I took a closer to look. My initial response to the article, upon sighting the title was a roll of the eyes and a mental, Here we go again. Oleg Volk recently published an article about G2 Research Ammunition – the so-called “RIP” (Radically Invasive Projectile) round that was the focus of such media hype (and equal amounts of derision).
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |